SEBI approves IT act for search and seizure and make rating voluntary for IPO

 SEBI Board Meeting
The SEBI Board met in Mumbai today and took the following decisions:
The Amendment to Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999
1. The Securities Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013 provides for regulation of pooling of funds under any scheme or arrangement, involving a corpus amount of one hundred crore rupees or more, to be deemed to be a Collective Investment Scheme, subject to sub-section (3) of section 11AA of the SEBI Act.
Accordingly, a proposal to amend the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999, providing a framework for regulation of such deemed Collective Investment Schemes and additional requirements for continuous compliance by a registered Collective Investment Scheme, was approved by the Board.
Amendments to SEBI (Investor Protection and Education Fund) Regulations, 2009
2. Consequent to the promulgation of Securities Laws (Amendment) (Second) Ordinance, 2013, the Board has approved amendment to SEBI (IPEF) Regulations, 2009 enabling utilization of such amounts primarily for restitution to investors and in case of failure of identification of investors, for the credit of amounts disgorged under the SEBI Act 1992, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956 or the Depositories Act 1996 to the Investor Protection and Education Fund of SEBI.
Class of companies eligible to file shelf prospectus for public issuance of non-convertible debt securities
3. While Companies Act, 1956 had allowed only Banks and Public Financial institutions to file Shelf Prospectus, the Companies Act, 2013 enables SEBI to specify the class of the companies which can be allowed to file Shelf Prospectus. In this regard, the Board has decided to allow the following class of entities to file Shelf Prospectus for public issuance of non-convertible debt securities:
(i) Public financial institutions and Scheduled Banks;
(ii) Issuers authorized by the notification of CBDT to make public issue tax free secured bonds;
(iii) Infrastructure Debt Funds - Non-Banking Financial Companies;
(iv) NBFCs, registered with RBI, Housing Finance Companies registered with National Housing Bank (NHB) and entities which have listed their shares/debentures in the stock exchanges for at least three years complying with the following criteria:
 net worth of Rs. 500 Crores,
 track record of three years of distributable profits,
 having a credit rating of not less than "AA-",
 having no default history or regulatory action pending with RBI, SEBI or NHB;
To avoid fragmentation of the issues, which will affect the floating stock and thereby liquidity, it is further stipulated that only a maximum of four issuances can be made under a Shelf Prospectus.
Further, companies filing a shelf prospectus with the Registrar of Companies are not required to file prospectus afresh at every stage of offer of securities, within the period of validity of such shelf prospectus i.e. one year. They are required to file only an information memorandum, containing material updations, with respect to subsequent issues.
SEBI (Procedure for Search and Seizure) Regulations, 2013
4. The Securities Laws (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2013, inter alia, confers direct powers on Chairman, SEBI to authorize the Investigating Authority or any other officer of SEBI to search any premises where incriminating documents are lying and seize such documents for the purpose of investigation. The Ordinance also empowers SEBI to make regulations for executing the search operations and to ensure safe custody of any books of account or other documents that are seized.
In this respect, the Board approved the SEBI (Procedure for Search and Seizure) Regulations, 2013, made on the lines of the provisions in the Income Tax Act, 1961 and for providing the detailed procedures for such search and seizures by SEBI.
Making IPO Grading Mechanism Voluntary - Amendment to SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2009
5. Considering the requests received from market participants, viz. investor associations and Association of Investment Bankers of India (AIBI), the recommendation of the advisory committee of SEBI, and to align with the principles laid down by Financial Stability Board (FSB) on reducing the reliance on Credit Rating Agencies, the Board approved the proposal to make the IPO grading mechanism "voluntary" as against the current provision of the same being "mandatory".
SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2013
6. The SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2013 were approved by the Board, subject to inclusion of the guidelines determining the settlement terms as part of regulations These regulations have been framed, keeping in view the provisions of the SEBI Act, as modified by the Securities Laws (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2013, as also the public comments received on the Consultation Paper on the draft regulations that was placed on the SEBI website.
The salient features of the SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2013 are as under:
(i) The Regulations lay down the stand alone common substantive procedure for settlement of administrative and civil proceedings under all the securities laws;
(ii) The Regulations formalize the already existing settlement process;
(iii) They also provide for the guiding factors for dealing with the settlement process;
(iv) Serious offences such as insider trading, etc. are excluded from the scope of settlement;
(v) In order to impart transparency in the process, the roles of the of internal committee(s) and high powered advisory committee are specifically defined;
(vi) The Regulations also provide for terms of settlement in monetary as well as non- monetary terms or combination of both.
FPI Regulations
7. As regards FPI Regulations, the communication from the Department of Economic Affairs to the CBDT and to SEBI, conveying the decision that all three categories of FPIs would be given similar tax treatment as available to FIIs presently, was noted.
Share on Google Plus

About Nitin Aggarwal

    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment